All Posts By

Allison Sit

Navigating Medical Therapies for Alopecia

By Medical Dermatology

medical therapies for alopecia

At the ODAC Dermatology Conference, Jennifer Soung, MD, FAAD, and Adam Friedman, MD, FAAD, outlined practical treatment strategies for alopecia, emphasizing clear thresholds for systemic therapy, realistic timelines for regrowth, and early use of combination regimens.

The session opened with a 42-year-old woman with five years of diffuse alopecia. Because nonscarring alopecias—including androgenetic alopecia, telogen effluvium, traction alopecia, tinea capitis, and alopecia areata—can appear similar, biopsy may be necessary when the diagnosis is unclear. In this case, biopsy confirmed alopecia areata, and treatment was initiated with ritlecitinib 50 mg once daily.

Severity assessment guides escalation of therapy. Patients with ≥50% scalp hair loss meet criteria for severe alopecia areata, though systemic therapy may also be appropriate in patients with 21–50% scalp loss and significant psychosocial impact. Clinical trial data show heterogeneous response times to JAK inhibitors: about 33% of patients respond within 12 weeks, 28% between 12–36 weeks, and 8% between 36–52 weeks, while roughly 31% may not respond after one year. Patients with ≥95% scalp hair loss or disease duration ≥4 years are more likely to be late responders.

Combination therapy is frequently required. In one case, recurrent patches developed seven months after starting ritlecitinib 50 mg daily. Adding low-dose oral minoxidil led to near-complete regrowth within three to four months. In practice, low-dose oral minoxidil is commonly started at 0.625 mg daily in women and about 1–1.5 mg daily in men, with titration depending on response.

Large cohort data suggest the drug is well tolerated. In a study of 1,404 patients, hypertrichosis occurred in 15.1%, lightheadedness in 1.7%, fluid retention in 1.3%, tachycardia in 0.9%, and headache in 0.4%; only 1.7% discontinued therapy due to adverse effects. Oral minoxidil should generally be avoided in patients with angina, heart failure, arrhythmias, pericarditis, pregnancy, or pheochromocytoma.

For female pattern hair loss, antiandrogen therapy is often combined with minoxidil. Spironolactone is typically prescribed at about 100 mg daily (range 25–200 mg) and may be used alone or with topical minoxidil 5% foam nightly. Clinical improvement generally requires at least 12 months of therapy and correlates with baseline disease severity.

Persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia, defined as hair loss lasting more than six months after chemotherapy, was also discussed. First-line therapy includes topical minoxidil 2–5% or oral minoxidil beginning at 0.5–1.25 mg daily, titrated up to 5 mg if needed. If response is inadequate, spironolactone around 100 mg daily can be added. Eyebrow or eyelash loss may respond to topical bimatoprost 0.03% daily. Finasteride and dutasteride should generally be avoided in patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

Scarring alopecias, such as frontal fibrosing alopecia and lichen planopilaris, require early anti-inflammatory therapy. Common regimens include potent topical corticosteroids, intralesional triamcinolone injections every 4–8 weeks (5–10 mg/mL), and doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for three months followed by anti-inflammatory dosing. Refractory disease may require hydroxychloroquine (<5 mg/kg/day), methotrexate 12.5–25 mg weekly, mycophenolate mofetil ~1 g twice daily, or pioglitazone 15 mg daily.

Drs. Soung and Friedman emphasized that alopecia treatment often requires layered therapy and patience. Meaningful regrowth typically occurs over months rather than weeks, and combining systemic and adjunctive therapies frequently produces the best outcomes.

This information was presented at the 2026 ODAC conference by Adam Friedman, MD, FAAD, and Jennifer Soung, MD, FAAD. The above highlights from this lecture were written and compiled by Samip Sheth, MD.

Medical Treatment Strategies for HS

By Medical Dermatology

medical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

New drugs on the market are revolutionizing the medical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Steven Daveluy, MD, FAAD, director of the Wayne State Dermatology Residency Program, shares what’s available and what’s coming for HS in this Next Steps in Derm video interview, conducted in partnership with the ODAC Dermatology Conference. With new treatment options in the toolbox, find out if there’s still room for the old standards. Learn why timing of treatment matters in outcomes. Plus understand your options when it’s time to shift the approach.

 

Further Reading

If you want to read more about the medical treatment of HS, check out the following articles published in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology:

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Novel Therapeutic Approach for Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Its Comorbidities

ABSTRACT

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with many comorbidities, including obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors, mental health issues, and many more disorders. Current treatments including biologics, topicals, and surgical interventions often fall short in terms of patient satisfaction, demonstrating a need for additional innovative approaches that address HS-related comorbidities.

Objective: This review explores the novel application of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in HS treatment, particularly for patients with comorbid conditions such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and obesity. Emphasis is placed on combination therapy and the potential for GLP-1RAs to address both HS symptoms and associated comorbidities, with careful consideration of patient selection.

Methods: A review of emerging evidence and existing literature on GLP-1RAs and their applications for weight loss, metabolic regulation, and anti-inflammatory effects was conducted.

Findings: GLP-1RAs offer dual benefits for HS patients by modulating inflammatory pathways and addressing associated comorbid conditions. Case studies and preliminary data suggest that GLP-1RAs may reduce lesion severity, systemic inflammation, and morbidity, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with existing treatments. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are indicated to confirm these findings.

Conclusion: GLP-1RAs represent a promising adjunctive or standalone treatment choice for those with HS and its related comorbidities. Further research is needed to establish their safety and efficacy in HS treatment.

A Review of the Current Landscape of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treatment Development

ABSTRACT

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by recurrent nodules and abscesses leading to subsequent scarring and tunnel formation. Despite being a fairly common disease with a significant impact on quality of life, only one drug, adalimumab, is currently US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treating HS. However, there are many clinical trials underway to address this gap in care for patients with HS.

Methods: All clinical trials related to HS as of 10/03/2022 were reviewed via clinicaltrials.gov. Studies on topical or systemic medical therapies were included and available results reported if they were ongoing or completed within 6 months prior to the search.
Results: Over 30 drugs with at least 20 different mechanisms of action are currently in development for the treatment of HS. While many of these are in phase 2 trials, several are undergoing phase 3 trials and will likely become viable treatment options in the next 5 years.

Conclusions: Following years of limited treatment options for HS, drug development has accelerated significantly, forecasting more treatment possibilities and better disease control for many patients.

Did you enjoy this video interview? Find more here.

 

 

 

Clindamycin phosphate 1.2% / Adapalene 0.15% / Benzoyl peroxide 3.1% Therapeutic Cheat Sheet

By Patient Care

Cabtreo

Managing acne vulgaris often means juggling multiple topicals—which can quickly tank patient compliance.

Next Steps in Derm’s Therapeutic Cheat Sheet on Cabtreo (Clindamycin phosphate 1.2% / Adapalene 0.15% / Benzoyl peroxide 3.1%) is a handy tool for trainees and experienced clinicians alike. The first FDA-approved, fixed-dose, triple-combination topical, it targets the core mechanisms of acne in a single, once-daily application.

Download the cheat sheet for indications, shelf life, key counseling messages, and more.

Biologic Access Made Easier

By ODAC Sessions

biologic access

Accessing biologics is a process that can be complicated for both the dermatology office staff and patients. Next Steps in Derm, in partnership with the ODAC Dermatology Conference, interviewed Heather Sawrey, biologic coordinator for the George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences Department of Dermatology. With more than 15 years of experience as a biologic coordinator in dermatology, she knows what’s needed for speedy biologic access. Watch and learn what you need to know about the approval timeline and fulfillment steps. Find out the biggest barrier in getting patients on biologics and the value of a “beefy note.” Feeling overwhelmed already? Hear how adding a biologic coordinator to your staff can help ease the burden and improve access.

Further Reading

If you want to read more about biologic access, check out the following articles published in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology:

No Racial Differences Found in Access to Biologics: A Population-Based Study of Psoriasis Patients in the United States

ABSTRACT

Background: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the role of race in access to biologics for patients with psoriasis. Objective: To compare biologic use among adult and pediatric United States psoriasis patients of different racial backgrounds.

Methods: Population-based study of US psoriasis patients using the 2003 to 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

Results: Among 31,525,500 adults and children with psoriasis (weighted), 3,026,578 (9.6%) were on biologics. Among psoriasis patients, 27,464,864 (87.1%) self-identified as white, 2,033,802 (6.5%) self-identified as Black, 1,173,435 (3.7%) self-identified as Asian or Pacific Islander, and 853,399 (2.7%) self-identified as other races. Among those on biologics, 2,778,239 (91.8%) self-identified as white, 84,971 (2.8%) identified as Black, 89,452 (3.0%) self-identified as Asian or Pacific Islander, and 73,917 (2.4%) self-identified as other races. Multivariate logistic regression revealed no significant differences in biologic access between whites and non-whites after adjusting for sociodemographic factors including insurance status (OR for Blacks: 0.347 [0.118, 1.021], P=0.055; OR for Asians: 0.616 [0.240, 1.579], P=0.311; OR for other races: 0.850 [0.216, 3.336], P=0.814.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that race alone is not independently associated with access to biologics among adult US psoriasis patients. Additional studies are necessary to evaluate factors independently associated with biologics access among adults and children with psoriasis in the US.

Evaluating Sentiment, Engagement, and Perception of Biologics Among Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis on Reddit

ABSTRACT

Background: Limited analyses of social media content among psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients exist. These patients may turn to social media to gain insight into treatments such as biologics.

Objectives: This study aims to analyze the content, sentiment, and engagement of social media posts regarding biologics for PsO and PsA.

Methods: Posts and comments discussing biologics were extracted from publicly accessible PsO and PsA Reddit groups. Posts were assigned higher (HOT) and lower order (LOT) themes, sentiments, and engagement scores.

Results: Of 1141 posts extracted, 705 posts were classified under the HOT general/efficacy. Twelve lower order themes (LOTs) were identified: general advice/experience (10.2%), symptoms improved (36.6%), switching biologics (10.5%), and time to results (13.4%). 61.3% of content was of positive sentiment, 24.0% was neutral, and 14.7% was of negative sentiment. The mean sentiment score, defined as the average of all posts’ sentiment scores (where negative=-1, neutral=0, and positive=1), was overall positive at 0.47, 95% CI [.41-.52]. Mean sentiment scores between LOTs were significantly different (P<0.001). Information regarding biologics on Reddit is mostly positive; however, there remains a significant number of users expressing dissatisfaction with their efficacy or with biologics in general. Many users sought anecdotal advice.

Conclusion: These findings can help guide educational efforts to anticipate concerns and appease hesitancy regarding biologics and their efficacy.

Did you enjoy this video interview? Find more here.

Imaging & Diagnostic Discordance: From the ODAC Poster Hall

By Medical Dermatology

inpatient dermatology

A study presented at ODAC 2026 highlights the critical value of early consultations in inpatient dermatology over heavy reliance on diagnostic imaging.

Key points include:

  • The Imaging Dilemma: Non-dermatology inpatient services often rely heavily on X-rays, CTs, and MRIs for skin presentations, despite findings being non-specific, costly, and prone to delaying targeted care.
  • Diagnostic Discordance: Reliance on non-specific imaging rather than clinical skin morphology often leads to misdiagnoses, prolonged hospital stays, and inappropriate treatments.
  • Clinical Realities: Looking at inpatient consults at UF Health Shands revealed an absolute difference of over 10% in diagnostic discordance when imaging was involved—underscoring how expertise directly impacts resource utilization.
  • Advocating for Early Consults: The findings demonstrate how timely dermatologic expertise reduces healthcare costs and streamlines patient management in the inpatient setting.

Read a Q&A with poster author Shiv Patel, BA, from the University of Florida College of Medicine. It’s a reminder that clinical skin evaluation remains unmatched, and dermatologists should be involved early in inpatient care.

What’s New in Skin Rejuvenation

By ODAC Sessions

skin rejuvenation

Regenerative topical products are trending. In a Next Steps in Derm interview, in partnership with the ODAC Dermatology Conference, Terrence Keaney, MD, FAAD, outlines topicals that have rejuvenating properties. Hear Dr. Keaney’s take on exosomes, platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF), and polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN), and why these products should only be applied topically. Find out the latest safety data on PDGF, and the current state of PDRN sourcing and efficacy data. Be up to date with your most voguish patient by watching this interview.

Further Reading

If you want to read more about skin rejuvenation, check out the following articles published in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology:

Regulatory Landscape of Regenerative Dermatology: Current Frameworks and Future

ABSTRACT

Background: Regenerative dermatology is an emerging subspecialty that seeks to restore the structure and function of healthy skin. The United States lacks comprehensive regulatory guidance for regenerative therapies. This review provides an overview of available therapies within regenerative dermatology, outlining the pathways for approval.

Methods: Articles on regenerative dermatology in PubMed and guidelines issued by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were reviewed with emphasis on those published between June 2020 and June 2025, and results were summarized in narrative format.

Results: In the United States, the FDA is the primary regulatory authority responsible for ensuring the safety and efficacy of regenerative biotherapeutics. Classification of a product as a drug, biologic, device, or cosmetic determines the regulatory pathway it must follow.

Discussion: Cosmetics are intended to promote attractiveness without treating or preventing disease and do not require FDA approval prior to marketing, while drugs and biologics undergo a multi-step process to obtain approval: (1) product development, (2) preclinical testing in a laboratory setting, (3) clinical trials involving human subjects, (4) FDA review, and (5) FDA approval. High-risk devices require a Premarket Approval (PMA), while low-to-moderate risk devices have less stringent requirements.

Conclusion: Regenerative dermatology offers significant therapeutic potential. Regulation is governed by the US FDA and varies according to product classification. Clinicians should counsel patients on safety and efficacy data prior to initiating regenerative treatments.

Exosomes in Cosmetic Dermatology: A Review of Benefits and Challenges

ABSTRACT

Background: Exosomes are small extracellular vesicles (30-150 nm in size) that play a critical role in cellular communication, transporting proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids between cells. This literature review focuses on evaluating the potential benefits and limitations of exosomes in enhancing skin health and aesthetics through indications such as skin rejuvenation, hair restoration, and pigmentation disorders.

Methods: A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed using specific MeSH, including “exosomes,” “aesthetics,” “cosmetic dermatology,” “skin rejuvenation,” “hair growth,” and “wrinkle reduction.” The search was limited to free-access studies published in various countries within the last ten years (2014-2024). As a result, a total of 56 relevant references were identified and reviewed to support the discussion.

Results: There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved exosomes. This review highlights exosomes’ potential in skin rejuvenation through extracellular matrix production and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) inhibition, as well as in hair restoration by stimulating follicle cell activity and modulating inflammation. Despite these benefits, challenges remain, including inconsistent isolation methods, source variability, and the need for clinical trials to confirm long-term safety and efficacy. The regulatory landscape is evolving, and further research is essential to meet standards before exosomes can be broadly adopted in cosmetic dermatology.

Conclusion: While exosomes hold significant potential for non-invasive cosmetic dermatology, there are challenges that need to be addressed, including the standardization of exosome isolation and characterization, the establishment of safety profiles, and the conduct of extensive clinical trials.

Did you enjoy this video interview? Find more here.

GLP-1 Agonists in Cutaneous Medicine: Rapid-Fire Insights

By ODAC Sessions

GLP-1 agonists in dermatology

At the ODAC Dermatology Conference, Drs. Jennifer Soung, Steven Daveluy, and Sarah Jackson joined moderator Dr. Adam Friedman for a rapid-fire discussion on GLP-1 receptor agonists in dermatology. “You honestly have to be living under a rock not to see the excitement around GLP-1s,” Dr. Friedman opened, noting their transformative impact across chronic disease management and weight loss.

Psoriasis highlights the link between obesity and systemic inflammation. “Psoriasis is intimately related to obesity,” Dr. Soung emphasized. “The higher the BMI, the higher the PASI score. GLP-1s aren’t just powerful for weight loss—they also improve blood pressure, glycemic control, cardiovascular outcomes.” She added, “Obesity is not a matter of choice; it is a neurohormonal disease.”

Weight loss may also enhance treatment outcomes. “One recent study showed that obesity can reduce the efficacy of biologics,” Soung noted. She highlighted that GLP-1–induced weight loss parallels benefits seen in low-calorie diets but without the extreme patient burden. “Patients can now lose more than 10% of their weight besides bariatric surgery,” she said, underscoring the systemic and potential anti-inflammatory benefits of GLP-1 agonists.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) reflects similar comorbidity patterns. Dr. Daveluy stated, “Obesity is a pro-inflammatory state. The interplay of inflammation and adipocytes can flare chronic skin disease.” He cited early studies showing that GLP-1 agonists improved HS outcomes, including modified Hurley stage and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores, sometimes independent of weight loss. “These agonists activate parts of the immune system and can decrease TNF, IL-17, and IL-23,” Daveluy explained.

The panel also explored aesthetic implications. “Massive weight loss impacts dermal white adipose tissue and facial structure,” said Dr. Jackson. She emphasized early intervention with fillers and biostimulatory treatments: “Start early—inject before patients experience facial volume loss. Target not only the skin but adipocytes and volume.” She also stressed patient counseling: “Set expectations—this isn’t a one-tube-of-filler journey. Go low and slow on GLP-1 doses, and support protein intake for hair and muscle.”

Hair loss emerged as a frequently reported adverse effect. “We see initial telogen effluvium and, surprisingly, early androgenic-like thinning,” noted Dr. Friedman. He recommended proactive measures: “Start oral or topical minoxidil early. Anti-androgen therapy can be considered, but increased blood flow through minoxidil is a great first step.”

Dr. Friedman concluded by summarizing one key takeaway: “Obesity and adipocyte dysfunction create a pro-inflammatory state that worsens chronic dermatologic disease. Removing that burden can have a positive impact, but everything has a cost.” The panel emphasized vigilance, early intervention, and coordinated care to maximize benefits while mitigating adverse effects such as lipoatrophy or hair thinning.

This information was presented at the 2026 ODAC conference by Steven Daveluy, MD, FAAD; Adam Friedman, MD, FAAD; Sarah Jackson, MD, FAAD; and Jennifer Soung, MD, FAAD. The above highlights from this lecture were written and compiled by Samip Sheth, MD.

Skin Barrier Repair in Acne with Cosmeceuticals

By ODAC Sessions

skin barrier repair in acne

Acne is a barrier deficiency disorder, according to Brooklyn, N.Y., dermatologist Dr. Hilary Baldwin. Next Steps in Derm, in partnership with the ODAC Dermatology Conference, interviewed Dr. Baldwin, who addresses the role of skin care in acne improvement. Find out why better products and vehicles could be the reason for the increasing placebo effect in acne studies. Find out the impact of acne treatments on the skin barrier and how this affects non-compliance. Hear what Dr. Baldwin says must happen in every acne visit. Plus learn the origin of the new term “acneceuticals” and what the latest research shows on the role of non-prescription active ingredients in acne care.

 

Further Reading

If you want to read more about cosmeceuticals for acne, check out the following articles published in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology:

The Use of Acneceuticals to Improve Acne Care: Introduction of a New Term and Review of the Literature

ABSTRACT

Background: Acne is a multifactorial inflammatory skin condition that commonly presents to the dermatology clinic. Treatment generally involves the use of pharmaceutical agents and procedural techniques. Recently, the importance of over-the-counter skin care in acne

has been recognized in many studies. This paper introduces the term acneceuticals to encompass a wide range of FDA monographed, yet non-prescription ingredients proven to alter the structure and function of acneic skin.

Methods: A panel of 8 dermatologists with an interest in acne and skin care performed a literature review of active skin care in acne. The role of acneceuticals in the treatment of acne — as monotherapy, adjunctive, and maintenance therapy — was evaluated using a modified Delphi approach. Studies were limited to in vivo human trials involving acne. Individual actives were assessed separately.

Results: The quality of evidence was moderate-to-low for many of the ingredients. Most of the actives included in the final assessment had been studied in vehicle-controlled, blinded, often comparative studies but enrolled a small number of subjects. In these studies, the acneceuticals were found to reduce lesion count, reduce sebum production, and improve efficacy of existing pharmacologic therapies.

Conclusion: Acneceuticals have demonstrated benefits in treating acne, alone or in conjunction with established pharmaceutical agents. These data allow us to make quality recommendations for our patients that should be a part of every patient encounter. The recommendations also serve as a guide for patients searching the internet for beneficial self-care products.

Real-World Clinical Case Series Utilizing Acneceuticals as Monotherapy, Adjunctive, or Maintenance Therapy for Acne Vulgaris

ABSTRACT

Background: Acne vulgaris is a common, multifactorial inflammatory skin disease for which there are many pharmacologic and procedural interventions. Recent publications have stressed the importance of quality skin care containing non-prescription actives (acneceuticals) in the treatment of this chronic disorder. Acne therapy is made more complicated by the diversity of presentation that includes age, gender, race, underlying skin type, product adherence, lesion morphology, and severity.

Methods: A panel of 6 dermatologists with expertise in the treatment of acne met twice for consensus conferences in March and November 2024. Discussion included the generation of 13 common disease presentations, the identification of potential cases to illustrate the presentations, and the design of 2-month case studies utilizing acneceuticals. Panelists chose new or established patients in their care who fit into the predetermined categories, provided them with the agreed-upon acneceuticals, and followed them for 2 months.

Results: Ten cases were chosen to comprise the most common therapeutic crossroads where pharmacologic or procedural interventions were not providing satisfactory control. This case study series included patients who were medication-intolerant, failing internet cures, not fully responsive to their current regimen, adult female acne patients with concomitant aging concerns, those needing maintenance therapy, and patients with issues regarding access to care.

Conclusions: Acneceuticals were found to play an important role as monotherapy, adjunctive therapy, and maintenance therapy for acne patients. The 10 cases elucidated the ability of these over-the-counter (OTC) actives to improve patient care under several clinical scenarios.

Did you enjoy this video interview? Find more here.

Beyond “Ozempic Face”: JDD Buzz Commentary

By Aesthetic Dermatology

Ozempic face

If you’ve spent time in clinic recently, you’ve undoubtedly heard it. A patient points to a newly gaunt appearance and asks, “Is this because of my weight loss medication?”

While the social media buzz around “Ozempic face” dominates patient conversations, the clinical reality is far more nuanced. A narrative review in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology evaluated the evidence behind the impact of rapid weight loss on soft tissue and shared guidance for dermatologists in counseling and treating weight loss patients.

In an interview with Next Steps in Derm, authors Sam Fathizadeh, BS, Dr. Melanie D. Palm, and Dr. Deirdre Hooper address the “attribution bias,” where patients—and even some clinicians—frequently blame GLP-1 drugs directly for skin laxity and volume loss. However, studies comparing bariatric surgery, dietary changes, and GLP-1 therapies show broadly similar effects on soft tissue. The primary driver of these changes is the rate and magnitude of rapid weight loss itself, regardless of the method.

The review highlights one area where GLP-1 agents may have a drug-specific effect: dermal white adipose tissue (dWAT). This specialized fat layer is closely integrated with the dermis and directly impacts skin thickness and facial volume. Early data suggests GLP-1 signaling may influence dWAT independently of overall fat loss—a key area of ongoing research for dermatologists.

Questions about weight loss and soft tissue will only multiply as GLP-1 indications expand. Check out the full interview and dive into the original article in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology to stay ahead of the curve.

Prurigo Nodularis: How to Treat

By Medical Dermatology

prurigo nodularis

With two FDA-approved therapies now available, it’s hard to believe that prurigo nodularis (PN) was only recently considered a unique dermatologic condition. In this Next Steps in Derm video interview, in partnership with the ODAC Dermatology Conference, ODAC Conference Co-Chair Adam Friedman, MD, FAAD, shares both the history and current state of PN treatment. Watch and learn if using dupilumab or nemolizumab is a slam dunk or if combination therapy may be needed for full clearance. Learn if there’s still a role for topical therapies in the age of systemics. Plus find out what’s coming down the PN pipeline.

Further Reading

If you want to read more about prurigo nodularis, check out the following articles published in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology:

New Horizons in Our Understanding of Prurigo Nodularis and Its Management

ABSTRACT

Prurigo nodularis (PN) was first accurately described more than a century ago by Hyde and Montgomery as chronic itchy nodules commonly noted in symmetric distribution on extensor sites of limbs, upper back, and abdomen.1 For decades PN patients were among the most challenging to treat as they suffer from intractable itch that affects their sleep dominates their daily life activities and causes many psychological comorbidities such as mood disorders including anxiety, stress, and depression. In the last decade, significant advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of PN have been achieved suggesting this condition involves mainly type 2 immune dysregulation and abnormal neural sensitization, which led to the development of new targeted treatments.

Management of Prurigo Nodularis

ABSTRACT

Background: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic disease characterized by intense pruritus and nodular lesions associated with reduced quality of life. Until recently, no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies have been available for the management of PN. Treatment regimens have been highly variable and clinical management guidelines are lacking overall; formal treatment guidelines do not exist within the US. In 2022, dupilumab became the first FDA-approved medication for PN. Multiple novel agents that target the neuroimmune underpinnings of the disease are currently in development and show promise for this challenging disorder.

Objective: To review current treatments and emerging therapies for effective management of patients with PN.

Methods: We reviewed publications on PN management identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. We also included publicly available data on clinical trials for PN therapies reported on the US National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov, the International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) Database, and the European Clinical Trials (EudraCT) Database.

Results: The recommended management of PN begins with an assessment of disease severity, including disease burden and pruritus intensity, and evaluation of comorbid medical disorders. Treatment goals include resolution of itch, improvement in nodules or cutaneous lesions, and improvement in quality of life. Therapies should be selected based on a patient’s clinical presentation and comorbidities. Treatment should simultaneously address the neural and immunologic components of PN. Combination therapy, particularly with conventional agents, may be beneficial.

Limitations: Data on most conventional PN treatments are limited to anecdotal reports, small clinical trials, or expert consensus recommendations. No head-to-head comparative trials have evaluated the relative efficacy of conventional and/or emerging agents, or combination therapy.

Conclusion: An effective treatment approach for patients with PN should reduce pruritus, allow nodular lesions to heal, and improve individual quality of life. The treatment landscape for PN is rapidly evolving with one FDA-approved agent and several new promising therapies on the horizon.

Did you enjoy this video interview? Find more here.